🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, however, may align so closely with the mythologized version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was in essence a selection process with many contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list included various figures, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. His harder interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to question.